﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:sciepub="http://www.sciepub.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/basic/1.2/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://www.sciepub.com/portal/Journals">
    <title>Journal of Sociology and Anthropology</title>
    <link>http://www.sciepub.com/journal/JSA</link>
    <description>Journal of Sociology and Anthropology is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that provides rapid publication of articles in all areas of sociology and anthropology. The goal of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of sociology and anthropology. </description>
    <dc:publisher>Science and Education Publishing</dc:publisher>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>2013 Science and Education Publishing Co. Ltd All rights reserved.</dc:rights>
		<prism:publicationName>Journal of Sociology and Anthropology</prism:publicationName>
		7
		1
		January 2023
		<prism:copyright>2013 Science and Education Publishing Co. Ltd All rights reserved.</prism:copyright>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li resource="http://pubs.sciepub.com/jsa/7/1/1"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://pubs.sciepub.com/jsa/7/1/2"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://pubs.sciepub.com/jsa/7/1/1">
<title>
Physical Anthropology and Race: A Reckoning for the Newly Renamed “Biological” Anthropology in 2020 and Beyond
</title>
<link>http://pubs.sciepub.com/jsa/7/1/1</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[Aleš Hrdlička, founder and editor of the <i>American Journal of Physical</i> <i>Anthropology</i> and instrumental in the founding of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists (AAPA) in 1930, cast a long shadow over the discipline during the 20th century due to his deeply rooted racism and use of the term “physical anthropology,” a practice focused on measuring the physical form. More troubling was Hrdlička’s study of the still-decomposing Native American remains from a late 19th-century massacre. He would later become the driving force behind the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of Natural History’s (NMNH) collection of skeletons of more than 30,000 Indigenous and enslaved people. Hrdlička’s inspiration could be traced indirectly to Samuel George Morton, a known racist and notorious human skull collector in early 19th-century Philadelphia. This study explores the discipline’s historically racist framework, in which human remains were studied to emphasize the biological and intellectual differences between the races. Primary and secondary sources in the form of 19th-century letters; books; museum record logs, including notes written directly on skulls; early 20th-century books; and journal publications were used. Several weeks of research in libraries and museums were employed to assess the materials and write this manuscript. Sociocultural factors impact science, and, as this study observes, the summer of 2020 brought a collision between the long-term fight for justice against U.S. federal agencies’ curation of these remains and the racial unrest erupting after the murder of George Floyd, a Black man in police custody. At that time, physical anthropology was caught in the middle, forcing the discipline out of complacency to make substantive policy changes away from the prevalent scientific racism of the past and the influence of Hrdlička in particular.]]>
</description>
<dc:creator>
Conrad  B. Quintyn
</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2023-05-23</dc:date>
<dc:publisher>Science and Education Publishing</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2023-05-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>10</prism:endingPage>
<prism:doi>10.12691/jsa-7-1-1</prism:doi>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://pubs.sciepub.com/jsa/7/1/2">
<title>
Commensality and the Variations in the Yagbon Community of North Gonja District of the Savannah Region of Ghana
</title>
<link>http://pubs.sciepub.com/jsa/7/1/2</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[This Paper Examines Commensality and the variations involved in the Yagbon Community of North Gonja District of the Savannah Region of Ghana. In most cultures, food has a significant impact on how families conduct their lives. The level of significance however, varies from culture to culture and tradition to tradition. People are said to break bread with one another when they eat a meal together with friends. The symbolic interaction theory put out by Nungesser  was adopted and used for the study. It examines the arbitrary interpretations and variations that people place on things, incidents and behaviours in order to analyze the society.  Both qualitative and descriptive approaches were used for the study. It was used because the former produces rich, detailed and valid process of data based on participants' perspectives and interpretations and the latter produces factual, reliable outcome data that can typically be generalized to some larger populations. The convenient sampling technique was used to select stakeholders because of the key roles they play in the study area. The targeted population included the chiefs, sub-chiefs, opinion leaders, the youth and households in Yagbon community. Focus group discussions interviews as well as observation were employed to collect the qualitative data and the data were summarized, grouped into major thematic areas and analyzed. Key findings were that commensality was seen as not only eating together on a table but also eating in the same bowl. Another key finding was that there was historical development of how eating together came into being in that community and this resulted in building a sense of familiarity with everyone in the group and fostering traditional bonding in the community. It was revealed that men and women don’t eat together in the same bowl when it comes to communal eating in the area. This was seen as a taboo in the community. Again, different households eat from the same bowl to preserve and record cultural legacy. It is recommended that policymakers, Ministry of Tourism, Metropolitan, Municipal, and District Assemblies must create awareness on the significance of commensality. This can also be done globally, geographically and focus must be on the use of interdisciplinary methods to keep the Communities bonds and identities for the youth to emulate in future.]]>
</description>
<dc:creator>
Zakaria  Shanunu, Eliasu  Alhassan
</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2023 -07-30</dc:date>
<dc:publisher>Science and Education Publishing</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2023 -07-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
<prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>17</prism:endingPage>
<prism:doi>10.12691/jsa-7-1-2</prism:doi>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>